|
|
|
|
||||
cold fusion incidentally01/24/2007 When the idea of cold fusion was first kicked around scientific think-tanks, it was seen as an excellent end to the energy crisis. Unlike nuclear fission, which breaks apart big atoms like uranium to produce power, nuclear fusion combines small molecules like hydrogen and helium to produce power. Nuclear fission, though relatively safe and efficient, produces large amounts of dangerous radioactive waste which don't decay for hundreds of years and give off dangerous radiation. Fusion, in comparison, produces hardly any radioactive waste. Unfortunately, the only fusion experiments that have been successful have been thermonuclear and occur at millions of degrees Celsius, usually exploding and melting things and generally making a mess of everything. So scientists postulated that they could create fission reactions (relatively) near room temperature and in (relatively) unpressurized environments, creating a great deal of power out of easily accessible materials while producing a very small amount of waste. This procedure was called "cold fusion." The following information in this article should be exactly what you are looking for and I hope it helps you. The main problem with cold fusion is that it doesn't work, or at least it hasn't worked yet. Hot fusion has worked, but so far it's been nearly impossible to control or maintain. When reactions occurring at millions of degrees Celsius are difficult to control it generally makes scientists and laymen alike a bit nervous, so most experts are hoping that cold fusion will be the answer to our problems after that. In 1987 two separate teams worked on cold fusion in Utah, Fleischmann and Pons and Stephen Jones. Neither team knew of the others' work until they submitted their papers for peer review. They had planned to release their papers simultaneously, but Pons and Fleischmann acted a day sooner than Jones and held their press release early. Jones then fired his article off to Nature, the rush to publish the findings caused quite a stir in national media. Much of the media buzz subsided quickly though, since the experiments weren't matching up to the proposed results. Peer review produced a string of failed experiments, and after the government investigated they found no evidence that cold fusion had been achieved. Though some cold fusion research is still being carried out and advances are still being made, most experiments are done by professors or retired professors working on shoestring budgets. In general, though we may still see reliable cold fusion reactors in our lifetime, combining hydrogen and helium to produce clean, plentiful energy, for the time being it's best not to hold your breath one surprising fact. Well, that's the end of my article. I hope you will be able to use this information. |
Recent cold fusion related posts:Barcode scanner what happened next satellite map by this time video rental to start off dvd rental in the second place replacement lcd screens for all that audio books online after that step wireless home security all in all buying online based on what happened motion activated camera most people would agree that tools manufacturer not everyone agrees with |
technology news
San Francisco's Chinatown a take-home mecca Spa Reveals Trends for Fall and Winter Recipe: Beef-Saucedd Hot Lettuce Salad Categoriescamera Related Blog Postsportable projection screens |
| other's articles: home | hobby | electronics | auto | truck | atv | motorcycle | ipod |
|